Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
Outside, the air was "code orange," unhealthy for sensitive groups.
The PM2.5 reading is 123, which means "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups".
In 2004, Fairfield County had the most orange days, in which ozone levels were considered unhealthy for sensitive groups, with 47.
A reading above 100 is deemed "unhealthy for sensitive groups" and anything above 400 is rated "hazardous" for all.
For more perspective, consider that any reading above 100 is deemed "unhealthy for sensitive groups" and that anything above 400 is rated "hazardous" for all.Like many Beijing residents, your correspondent has mobile-phone apps that keep up with the pollution readings.
Any figure above 100 would be considered "unhealthy for sensitive groups," and above 150 is "unhealthy" for everyone.
Similar(45)
Regarding benchmarks as indicators of safe exposure, there is evidence that disease occurs below the existing prescribed limits; thus allowances may need to be revised in accordance with estimates that take multiple exposures into account especially for highly sensitive groups (e.g. young children).
The cutoff point for the sensitive group was above 50%, while for the resistant group it was below 30% [ 12].
The data for these double-blind tests (Fox E, personal communication) show that correct versus incorrect results were 60.6% (p < 0.005) for the sensitive group and 49.4% (not significant) for the control group.
For the BCell panel based SPLS model, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis is shown in Figure 2B and Figure 3B to illustrate the distinction between the predicted resistant, intermediate and sensitive groups for the Arkansas data.
Future research could focus on the views and perceptions of privacy sensitive groups (for one example see [ 16]), also expanding on the nuanced nature of privacy needs by considering specific examples of EHR implementation and targeted areas of concern to address this multi-dimensional and complex area of study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com