for roughly two months

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for roughly two months" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate an approximate duration of time, often in contexts discussing experiences, events, or activities. Example: "I lived in Paris for roughly two months before moving to London."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

While China produces strawberries for roughly two months of the year, California offers them year-round.

The New York Times - Sports

The McCain campaign also paid Amy Strozzi, Ms. Palin's traveling makeup artist, $68,400 for roughly two months of work.

The New York Times

As noted above, a better alternative is to divide by 10 because students do not attend school for roughly two months during their summer vacations.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

The couple had been engaged for roughly two months.

HuffPost

Charles Tupper was prime minister for roughly two months in 1896 before losing an election to Wilfrid Laurier.

Vice

Rob and Chyna, who'd been publicly together for roughly two months before getting engaged, apparently announced the news via Instagram without informing the Kardashian family.  .

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

For roughly nine months a year, the Jamisons' animals eat nothing but grass.

The New York Times - Food

The interim chancellor will serve for roughly six months while the board seeks a permanent replacement for Rudy Crew.

The New York Times

Collectively, according to EPA officials, Pruitt paid $6,100 to stay in the condo for roughly six months.

The Washington Post

I had a cottage in Wales with my wife and two kids, and we were out and about for roughly nine months of the year.

The Guardian

After ousting Dr. Crew in December, the Board of Education hired Mr. Levy to lead the school system for roughly six months while it searches for a new chancellor.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "for roughly two months", ensure the context requires an approximate timeframe rather than an exact duration. It is suitable when precision is not critical.

Common error

Avoid using "for roughly two months" when the exact duration is known or easily verifiable. In such cases, stating the precise duration enhances credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for roughly two months" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb or noun by specifying the duration of an action or state. Ludwig AI indicates its acceptability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Wiki

15%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for roughly two months" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate an approximate duration of time. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English, particularly in news and media contexts. While not ideal for situations requiring exactness, it's a useful expression for conveying estimated timeframes. Alternatives include phrases like "for approximately two months" or "for about two months", depending on the desired level of formality. Common errors involve using it when a precise duration is known, which can undermine credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for approximately two months

Replaces "roughly" with "approximately", maintaining a similar level of precision.

for about two months

Substitutes "roughly" with "about", offering a more casual tone.

for nearly two months

Replaces "roughly" with "nearly", indicating a close approximation.

for almost two months

Uses "almost" instead of "roughly", suggesting a near duration.

for around two months

Uses "around" in place of "roughly", indicating an estimated duration.

for approximately 60 days

Replaces "two months" with a numerical approximation in days, increasing precision.

for a couple of months

Replaces "roughly two months" with a more informal expression.

spanning approximately two months

Introduces "spanning" to emphasize the duration's reach, slightly altering the focus.

during approximately two months

Replaces "for" with "during", shifting the perspective to an event's timeframe.

in the neighborhood of two months

Uses a more figurative expression to indicate approximate duration.

FAQs

What's a similar phrase to "for roughly two months"?

Alternatives include "for approximately two months", "for about two months", or "for nearly two months".

Is it okay to say "for roughly two months", or is it too vague?

The phrase "for roughly two months" is perfectly acceptable when you need to indicate an estimated period, not an exact one. Context determines whether the approximation is appropriate.

How can I use "for roughly two months" in a sentence?

Example: "The project lasted for roughly two months, but we managed to complete it successfully".

What's the difference between "for roughly two months" and "for exactly two months"?

"For roughly two months" indicates an approximate duration, while "for exactly two months" denotes a precise and confirmed timeframe.