Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The results, shown in Fig. 7, demonstrate once again that the best choice for rise time using the Song et al. approach in Eq. (8) is (tau = infty), i.e., (v_0 x) = 0).
The UV photodetector shows great responsivity (0.6 A/W); high on/off ratio of the Jsc signal (440,563%); very fast response (0.02 s for rise time and 0.004 s for decay time) under 40 mW cm−2 UV irradiation.
Current-clamp recordings indicated that the directional asymmetry of the voltage response is also similar to the asymmetry observed for the currents (Figure 1, AI = 0.175±0.064 for amplitude and 0.634±0.059 for rise time, n = 4).
EPSCs evoked in PCs by CF stimulation in WT and Tc1 mice presented similar kinetics, whereas PF-EPSCs from Tc1 mice showed significantly slower kinetics when compared with WT littermates (F1,27=7.34, P < 0.05 and F1,27=11,74, P < 0.01 for rise time and decay time, respectively; Table 2).
Similar(56)
However, the population distributions for rise times and peak amplitudes were significantly different (P< 0.05 and P< 0.005, respectively), with the eSOC population containing larger, slower events (Fig. 2A).
Then sided two-sample Welsh's t-test for exponential time constants (p = 0.45%) and for fibrillogenesis rise time at origin (p = 0.42%) showed significant differences for slow and fast kinetics.
Total sample sizes in meta-analyses ranged from N = 17,215 for chair rise time to N = 1,061,855 for grip strength.
As seen in Table 2, a time shift of (tau =2) min is the best-matched case for a rise time of 3 min.
It is worth mentioning that the time constant for the rise time is always faster than the fall time, which is believed that traps and other defect states were involved in the process.
The second column of Table 2 shows the results of three indices comparing Model I and modified Model I for a rise time ranging from 0 min (no rise time) to 5 min in steps of 1 min.
Except for this rise time difference, in both sites the pattern of ERP signal (positive-negative-positive) remained intact during both types of trials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com