for review

USAGE SUMMARY

"for review" is a perfectly correct and usable part of a sentence in written English, though the exact usage may vary depending on the context.
For example, you could use it to specify that a task is to be reviewed by someone else: "Please submit your report for review before the end of the day."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

These are up for review in Vienna.

The Economist

But baseball does have room for review.

The New York Times

(Six episodes were available for review).

The New York Times - Arts

Recently my school came up for review.

The New York Times - Magazine

(Vogue provided temporary access for review purposes).

The New York Times

(3 Time for review.

Cornell University

"What's the process for review?

The New York Times

(2 Alien's request for review.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

Justice Breyer criticized the majority opinion's outlined framework for review.

The New York Times

Sixty-four papers were selected for review.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

In theory, these tax breaks should come up for review.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for review" to clearly indicate that something is intended to be examined and assessed. For instance, "The document is ready for review before submission."

Common error

Avoid using "for review" when the context already implies examination. For example, instead of saying "Submit your application for review review", simply say "Submit your application for review".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for review" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb to indicate the purpose or intention behind an action. Ludwig confirms this usage is grammatically correct and widely applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Academia

30%

Science

26%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

1%

Cover Letter

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the prepositional phrase "for review" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that something is intended for examination or assessment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and provides numerous examples across diverse fields such as News & Media, Academia, and Science. While alternatives like ""for assessment"" or "under review" exist, "for review" maintains a neutral to professional tone suitable for most contexts. Remember to avoid redundancy and ensure the context genuinely implies a need for examination. This guide has addressed typical usage, common errors, and alternative phrasing to help you confidently use "for review" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for assessment

Replaces "review" with a synonym focusing on evaluation.

for consideration

Emphasizes the act of thinking about something carefully.

for examination

Highlights a more detailed and formal inspection.

for evaluation

Focuses specifically on judging the value or quality.

to be reviewed

Changes the phrase from a prepositional phrase to a passive infinitive.

under review

Indicates that something is currently being examined.

being reviewed

Highlights the ongoing nature of the examination.

up for review

Suggests something is scheduled or available for examination.

subject to review

Emphasizes that something is conditional upon examination.

pending review

Indicates that an examination is awaiting.

FAQs

How to use "for review" in a sentence?

Use "for review" to indicate the purpose of examination or assessment, such as "The report is available "for assessment"" or "Please submit the proposal "for consideration"".

What can I say instead of "for review"?

Alternatives include phrases like ""for assessment"", "for examination", or "under review", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "for review" or "to review"?

Both can be correct, but they serve different grammatical functions. "For review" is a prepositional phrase indicating purpose, while "to review" is an infinitive phrase expressing an action. For example, "The document is for review" vs. "The document needs to be reviewed".

What's the difference between "under review" and "for review"?

"Under review" implies that something is currently being examined, while "for review" simply indicates that something is intended or available for examination. For example, "The application is under review" means it's being processed, while "The application is for review" means it's ready to be examined.