Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(6)
92, 1494 1502] ANOVA-Type statistic performed best; for responses with negative correlations, in general, an approximation based on the Lawley Hotelling type test performed best.
However, opinions varied as to the preferred format for responses with some advising more opportunity for open-ended feedback.
An 80%% rule was used for responses with missing data on the 'Mind the Gap' scale as recommended by its developers [ 29].
The means and standard deviations of variables were computed at baseline and at the end of the study; for responses with missing values, the means and standard errors (SE) were reported after multiple imputation.
Regression coefficients for responses with Q values higher than 0.4, are shown in Figure 4 (Additional file 6 (AF6) showed regression coefficients of scaled and centered variables for all predictors and responses).
A repeated measurements ANOVA with the factors SIDE of the response movement and GROUP (ADHD versus healthy controls) revealed shorter reaction times for responses with the dominant right than with the left hand (F(1 35) = 5.9; p = 0.02).
Similar(54)
Results found that use of this measure (three options for response) with hexafactorial oblique structure can be more acceptable than the original version.
All 19 patients were evaluable for response, with the results summarized in Table 4.
In total, 96 patients were evaluable for response, with the remaining 17 patients being evaluable only for clinical benefit.
Of the 24 patients entered, 23 were evaluable for response, with one patient refusing to continue treatment during CRT.
Local progression for soft-tissue and bone lesions: Each metastasis is a target lesion independently assessed for response with the RECIST criteria [ 15 ].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com