Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Adobe initially charged for Reader, and with few Readers there were few reasons to buy Acrobat.
For reader and writer alike, they pose less risk.
In other words, there are plenty of loopholes in the story for reader and revisionist alike to crawl through.
In trying to capture this impermanence, Rush creates a lot of uphill work for reader and writer alike.
At the same time Swift is a problem for reader and biographer because, as Damrosch notes on Page 178 (of 573), "the cast of characters in Swift's life grew much larger.
But when, as Pendleton points out, your day-job consists of riding around a big room in circles, "like crazy people on bikes without brakes... churning and turning (y)our legs in quiet desperation," and then those repetitions are turned round and round in print, a definite sense of deja vu begins to set in, both for reader and for rider.
Similar(53)
Worth it for readers and for writers.
What does this mean for readers and writers?
Print publications vie with each other and with online news platforms for readers and for revenue.
"It's bad for readers and authors, and is illogical given the cost savings of digital.
Publishers face strong competition for readers and advertisers from the internet.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com