Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Score one point for rational, concentrated thinking.
I'm all for rational assessments.
For Rational Economic Man, there's no difference.
So I return to the need for rational analysis.
It was a victory for rational and vaguely negative thinking.
It also explored Nitschke's advocacy for "rational suicide".
And the power for rational thought is thereby dwarfed.
It leaves room for rational discourse, or ought to.
It created a predictable storm, which pleased his publishers, but it did little for rational discussion.
But Saatchi has a ready answer: "I don't think bereavement is a disqualification for rational thought".
To look too narrowly for rational purpose in it is to mistake its very nature.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com