Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The piddling $1.6 million that GM is paying Autobytel for the D.C. test doesn't speak highly for how GM values the technology or the traffic the car site brings to the table, or for probable interest from any other manufacturer.
Similar(58)
If non-central bankers learned about probable interest-rate movements, the temptation to trade on this information would be almost overwhelming, particularly for spies facing tighter budgets.
The high prevalence estimates for all headache on ≥15 d/mo (7.2%) and for probable MOH (3.1%) were also, very probably, influenced by interest-bias.
A priori, we were interested in the proportion of participants who met criteria for probable depression who received any mental health-related care.
Criteria for probable minor depression required at least one core symptom (depressed mood or loss of interest) and a total of two to four positive symptoms for at least the last 2 weeks.
Dialectic, on the other hand, starts with probable premises and makes persuasive arguments for probable conclusions.
The proportions of constant probable diagnosis by primary headache subtype were as follows: 75.9 % (n = 63) for probable migraine, 73.7 % (n = 70) for probable TTH, 71.4 % (n = 5) for probable TAC, and 76.0 % (n = 19) for probable OPHD (Fig. 1).
Among patients with headache recurrence, the proportion of constant diagnosis was higher for probable migraine than for probable TTH plus probable OPHD (59.2 vs. 23.1 %; P < 0.001).
The reported frequency for a constant diagnosis was 38.8 44.7 % for probable migraine and 24.6 53.9 % for probable TTH.
Regarding the constant probable diagnosis, no significant difference was observed between probable migraine, probable TTH, and probable OPHD (P = 0.935); however, subgroup analysis involving patients with headache recurrence showed that the proportion of constant diagnosis was significantly higher for probable migraine group and probable TTH plus probable OPHD group (P = 0.001, Fig. 2).
The second and third subgroups meet criteria for probable CH.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com