Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The validation results showed that, area under the curve for the results of DT and integrated method of FR and LR was 87%and90%0% for success rate and 82% and 83% for prediction rate respectively.
The AUC for prediction rate was 0.77.
The prediction of the model was 87%% for success rate and 77 % for prediction rate.
The AUC for prediction rate is shown in Figs. 14 and 15, for both models.
Similar(55)
For generating of prediction rate curve (PRC), a method similar to SRC was followed except that on y-axis the groundwater potential yield in the test dataset was plotted (Chung and Fabbri 2003).
The area under the curve for prediction-rate of EBF and LR methods were calculated 78%and72%2% respectively.
It plots the prediction rate for insulators (correctly versus incorrectly predicted) throughout the full spectrum of possible prediction thresholds.
The AUC was obtained for both the training (success rate) and testing (prediction rate) for both models by using ROC module in IDRISI software, Figs. 14 and 15.
(Randomly picking 4233 pairs from 1729 proteins will only yield a 7% correct prediction rate for KEGG and 12% for GO on average from 100 trials).
For all the other values of ( eta left( {0. 1- 0. 9} right) ) the prediction rate for all fingerprints is equal.
Success rate and prediction rate for ensemble WoE and RBF-SVM method were 96.48% and 95.67% respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com