for people without

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for people without" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to individuals who lack a certain quality, resource, or characteristic. Example: "This program is designed for people without access to reliable internet."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It's great for people without health insurance".

The New York Times

The gains would be even larger for people without children.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Please see our Suggestions for People Without a Technical Background.

University of California, Berkeley

That compares with 63.7 percent for people without a disability.

The New York Times

He added, "Tofu is like food for people without teeth".

The New York Times

Things are much worse for people without college degrees, though.

The New York Times

Prepaid cards offer some advantages for people without checking accounts.

The New York Times

Selfies were for people without friends; the savvy moved on to more advanced networks.

The New Yorker

Medicaid would no longer pay for nursing home care for people without any other assets.

The New York Times

And his wife is a physician who has spent her career caring for people without insurance.

The New York Times - Health

"This has really opened up opportunities for people without formal titles".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for people without", ensure the context clearly defines what is lacking and why it matters. Be specific to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "for people without" in contexts where the lack of something is assumed or obvious. Always provide a specific reason or implication of the absence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for people without" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or clause. It introduces a group of individuals who lack a specific attribute, condition, or resource. Ludwig confirms that this phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for people without" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that serves to identify a group lacking a specific characteristic or resource. According to Ludwig, it is very common and suitable for various contexts, including news, academic writing, and everyday conversation. While versatile, it's important to ensure clarity and specificity when defining what is lacking, to avoid overgeneralization. Remember to tailor your language based on the context, considering more formal alternatives like "for individuals lacking" or "for those who lack" when appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for those who lack

A more concise and direct alternative, using "those" to refer to people and "lack" to indicate absence.

for individuals lacking

Replaces "people" with "individuals" and uses "lacking" instead of "without", offering a more formal tone.

intended for those without

Specifies the intended audience of something, emphasizing the absence of a particular attribute.

aimed at those missing

Highlights the absence of something as the defining characteristic of the target group.

catering to individuals who don't have

Focuses on providing for a specific group that does not possess something.

to support persons not having

Focuses on supporting individuals who do not have a particular resource or attribute.

for persons deficient in

A highly formal and technical alternative, suitable for legal or scientific contexts.

designed for the absence of

Emphasizes the design purpose related to the lack of something.

in the absence of resources for

Addresses scarcity as a challenge for a certain population.

for non-possessors of

A more formal and somewhat uncommon way to express the lack of possession.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "for people without" to sound more formal?

You can use alternatives like "for individuals lacking", "for those who lack", or "for persons deficient in" depending on the context and level of formality required.

Is "for people without" grammatically correct?

Yes, "for people without" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in English. According to Ludwig, it's used to refer to individuals who lack a certain quality, resource, or characteristic.

What are some common situations where I might use "for people without"?

This phrase is frequently used when discussing access to resources (e.g., "for people without health insurance"), skills (e.g., "for people without technical backgrounds"), or opportunities (e.g., "for people without formal titles").

What is a more concise alternative to "for people without"?

A more concise alternative is "for those without". It maintains the same meaning while using fewer words.