Exact(1)
Fig. 6 Aserage network throughput vshownuse tine Fig. 7 PDR vs. pause time.
Similar(59)
ITheseclear that fuzzy AODV protocolsbetter than the other two routing protocolshowd achieves a higher packet delivery ratio (PDR) thanothe traditional AODV and MBCR routing protocolsignificant
Average delay variation, jitter, has been analyzed in Figure 11 for increasing pause time.
Figures 12 and 13 show routing overhead in terms of packets for increasing pause time and increasing node mobility.
The RandomDirection2dMobility model uses random values for speed, pause time, direction, and acceleration of the mobile nodes, which is corresponding to the real-life Wi-Fi network scenario.
The simulation results [8] for -second pause time (in 30-source scenario) and the corresponding formal model results are tabulated in Table 2.
Figure 12 Routing overhead in terms of control packets for each successfully delivered data packet for various node pause time.
The node may remain paused for some random pause time before starting its movement toward the next waypoint.
Once the mobile node reaches that location, it becomes stationary for a predefined pause time,.
Figure 3 shows the routing control overheads for different node pause time.
The node may also remain stationary for a random pause time before starting its movement towards the next destination.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com