Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
If future studies could confirm the size of CLNM as an independent factor for outcomes, reporting the size of CLNM in the histopathology reports could become important.
Similar(59)
ICC is around 4% for outcomes reported by written questionnaire and around 20% for outcomes reported by Video questionnaire.
For outcomes reported as continuous variables, means and standard deviations were extracted.
For outcomes reported as rates or proportions, a pooled estimate of the proportion will be estimated by weighting the studies according to their sample sizes (inverse variance).
The reasons for exclusion were: reviews with descriptive analyses only (n = 7); Cochrane review not meeting the inclusion criteria for outcomes reported (n = 1); meeting report summarising results reported elsewhere (n = 1); no inclusion of subgroup population for mass vaccination (n = 1); inclusion criteria for outcomes reported not fulfilled (n = 17).
It is equally important to assess the potential for outcome reporting bias at the systematic review level.
Objectives To provide information on the frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials.
This review will assess study protocols for outcome reporting bias by judging whether authors have selectively reported outcomes using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias.
Moreover, we discovered that nearly a fifth of studies that underwent an assessment for outcome reporting bias had actually provided full data (which had somehow been omitted from the review) on the single primary harm outcome.
No reviews overlapped in the two cohorts (they stemmed from non-overlapping time periods), and none of the studies assessed for outcome reporting bias were included in multiple reviews.
For these outcomes, reporting a time frame is not possible, and the timeframe was therefore denoted as irrelevant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com