Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
The overall FVDR for referrals by a non-OSI was 36.1% and for OSI referrals was 14.1% (difference 22% CI 16.9% to 26.7%, p<0.001).
Further kudos are owed to MongoDB for definitively stating that they will be using SSPL, submitting SSPL in parallel to an organization called Open Source Initiative (OSI) for endorsement as an open-source license, but not waiting for OSI's endorsement to start releasing software under the SSPL.
OSI was calculated as follows: The intra-observer coefficient of variation for OSI was 2.2% [ 35].
He's the perfect guy for Osi to play with.
No significant differences were found for OSI or anatomical measurements such us Dmax and Z-score.
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J., Nov. 28 — There is no practical reason for Osi Umenyiora to know this, but he did.
Similar(44)
Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) was the commonest reason for referral for OSIs and non-OSIs, 28.7% and 36.1%, respectively, of total referrals.
However, in terms of rate of increase for IOP only referrals post-NICE, this was similar for both groups (×2.6 increase for OSIs and ×2.4 increase for non-OSIs).
The overall FVDR for referrals by a non-OSI was statistically significantly higher than that for OSIs (particularly the Manchester GRRS), suggesting superior concordance of the OSI findings with the final provider.
The proportion of referrals for elevated IOP increased from 10.9% pre-NICE to 28.0% post-NICE for OSIs, and from 19% to 45.1% for non-OSIs.
The first-visit discharge rate (FVDR) for all time periods for OSIs was 14.1% compared with 36.1% from non-OSIs (difference 22%, CI 16.9% to 26.7%; p<0.001).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com