Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
● The reproducibility of the test method was not described or was described for only one observer.
Similar(59)
Observer effects were included as random (not shown), except for Gyrodactylus sp. for which there was only one observer.
For the current study, there was discrepancy between both observers for the 1.5 T MRI, only one observer identified a lesion.
In most cases, it was only one observer deviating from the rest.
There are some advantages of using only one observer.
The fact that only one observer who was not blinded to the hypothesis collected the data for the study could have introduced a data collection bias.
Only one observer made each measurement (including biochemical assays), to eliminate interobserver bias.
In the remaining six patients, one observer identified a lesion, whereas the other did not (n = 5), or both observers identified one identical lesion, and only one observer identified a second lesion (n = 1).
Likewise, in order to reduce an incorrect classification, there will be only one observer.
As regards research, we suggest to try and use only one observer.
In the remaining five patients, one observer identified a lesion, whereas the other observer did not (n = 1); both observers identified one identical lesion, and only one observer identified a second lesion (n = 2); or a lesion in the right side of the pituitary gland was identified by one observer, and a lesion in the left side of the pituitary gland was identified by the second observer (n = 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com