Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(35)
For most methods a good agreement with curve-fitting results was achieved.
For most methods, free implementations are available either with a graphical or programming interface, of which we give an overview in Supplementary Table 1.
For most methods, such constraints have no formal documentation, and human-readable documentation of them is usually incomplete and ambiguous.
Unfortunately, for most methods and techniques we have little support that they are good or even best.
For most methods, these results did not vary strongly over a wide range of acquisition parameters (number of diffusion weighting directions and b value).
However, the application to a case study resulted in similar assessments for most methods with regard to total impact while rather small deviations in the contribution of individual substances were found.
Similar(25)
For instance, most methods are designed to deal only with studies comparing case versus control.
Most methods for determining relative geologic ages are well illustrated in sedimentary rocks.
Most methods for cultures were as described previously.
Most methods for induction are used but data on risks related to induction methods are sparse.
Most methods for detecting recombinations perform poorly at this level of divergence [ 47].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com