Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
However, for most compounds, the production yield is far from reaching economical targets.
Satisfactory inter-day precision values between 4% and 23% (n = 5) were obtained for most compounds.
Note the variation in widths of prediction intervals, which for most compounds ranges 0.1 0.8 log units.
Calibration was observed to be generally consistent for most compounds using either set of mass-labelled internal standards.
Nevertheless, removal efficiency increased to 94% for most compounds using an optimal ozone dose of 9 mg/L (Figure 4).
Ion suppression due to the matrix was <20% for most compounds, and higher than 60% for EME and diethylpropion.
For most compounds, two transitions; a quantifier (the most abundant product) and a qualifier (the second most abundant product) were selected.
For most compounds, there are at least two allowed excited-states showing a strong molar absorption coefficient in the UV/Vis region.
A human serum standard reference material (NIST SRM 1957) was included in the validation scheme to evaluate method trueness, which proved satisfactory (│Z-scores│<2 for most compounds).
The 3-parameter sink diffusion model provided acceptable fits for most compounds and the 4-parameter two-sink model provided acceptable fits for the others.
From optical absorption spectra, the band-gap energy was obtained in the range 2.8 3.0 eV for most compounds, while this parameter decreased down to 1.64 eV for samples deposited at 4.5 mTorr and 80 W.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com