for monetary damages

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for monetary damages" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to refer to compensation sought or awarded in a lawsuit for loss or injury. Example: "The plaintiff is seeking compensation for monetary damages resulting from the breach of contract."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

Instead, the players are seeking summary judgment for monetary damages.

The New York Times - Sports

There is no jury, and there are no claims for monetary damages, just corrective actions.

The New York Times

Shareholders cannot sue under Section 13(d), and companies cannot sue for monetary damages.

The New York Times

But that did not resolve claims for monetary damages for the earlier violations.

The New York Times

Vice Chancellor Laster noted that the Del Monte directors were unlikely to be found liable for monetary damages.

The New York Times

The two parties did not disclose additional financial terms of the agreement, but the publishers had not asked for monetary damages.

The New York Times - Tech

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

These lawsuits not only ask for large monetary damages, but also for an injunction against the US government spying on over 300 million citizens in violation of the Patriot and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Acts.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Our position is simply that everyone involved in this undeniable misconduct should be held responsible," said Christopher J. Clark, a lawyer for University Sports, which is asking for punitive monetary damages to be assessed against Boies Schiller.

The New York Times

As a result, it is not uncommon for some owners to pursue defaulting market-rate tenants for whatever monetary damages the law will allow.

The New York Times

The boys are charging sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress, suing Mr. Marsh for unspecified monetary damages, and the other defendants are being sued for negligence, among other allegations.

The New York Times

That lawsuit asks for both monetary damages and a permanent injunction.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When drafting legal documents, ensure that "for monetary damages" is followed by a clear explanation of the specific losses incurred and how they are quantified. For instance, specify whether you're including lost profits, medical expenses, or other quantifiable losses.

Common error

Avoid using "for monetary damages" when the desired remedy includes actions beyond financial compensation, such as injunctive relief or specific performance. Be precise in delineating the types of compensation sought to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for monetary damages" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or noun, specifying the type of compensation being sought in a legal context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates that the claim involves financial compensation rather than other forms of redress.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Encyclopedias

12%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Science

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for monetary damages" is a grammatically correct and frequently used term, especially in legal and news contexts, to denote that financial compensation is being sought in a claim. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is typically used in legal settings to specify the type of compensation. While alternatives exist, such as "to recover financial losses" or "to claim financial compensation", this phrase remains the most precise and formal way to indicate financial redress. Remember to avoid confusing this phrase with non-financial remedies and to clearly articulate the specific losses incurred to enhance clarity. It is primarily used in formal and professional settings, and its use is well-supported by authoritative sources like The New York Times and Encyclopedia Britannica.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to receive monetary compensation

Focuses on the act of obtaining money as a form of reparation.

to seek pecuniary compensation

Replaces "monetary" with its synonym "pecuniary", maintaining a formal tone.

to sue for financial redress

Focuses on the legal action taken to correct a financial wrong.

to claim financial compensation

Emphasizes the act of asserting a right to financial redress.

to secure financial restitution

Emphasizes the restoration of something lost or stolen in financial terms.

to demand financial reparations

Highlights the aspect of repairing or making amends for financial harm.

to recover financial losses

Focuses on the act of regaining financial losses, instead of seeking damages.

to obtain monetary relief

Replaces "damages" with "relief", indicating a more general form of assistance.

to get financial reimbursement

Highlights the act of receiving repayment for incurred financial costs.

in pursuit of financial remedies

Shifts focus to the legal recourse for financial redress.

FAQs

How is "for monetary damages" typically used in legal contexts?

It's generally used to specify that a party is seeking financial compensation in a lawsuit, as opposed to other forms of remedy such as an injunction or specific performance.

What's a simpler alternative to "for monetary damages"?

You could say "to get money as compensation" or "to be paid "financial compensation"" depending on the context.

Is it correct to use "for monetary damages" in non-legal contexts?

While technically correct, it sounds formal. In everyday speech, it's better to use alternatives like "to be paid for expenses" or "to get "financial reimbursement"".

What is the difference between "for monetary damages" and "for civil damages"?

"For monetary damages" specifies the type of compensation sought, while "for civil damages" indicates the type of legal claim. Both terms can be used together or separately depending on what you want to convey.