Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
Estimations made for men did not include this category in the logistic regression model.
Some of the other outcomes for men did show differences in the hypothesised direction (table 5).
These associations were weakened by depression, although only for men did all associations remain statistically significant after adjustment for depression (for women, only disability retained statistical significance).
Although not statistically significant, probably because of very small numbers in the reference category, use of fossil fuels for heating in the past, and employment in 'potentially noxious' industries (for men) did lead to increased risks for oral cancers.
Associations with arsenic as a continuous variable were consistent with the null, and overall, the findings for men did not support an effect of arsenic exposure on ECG abnormalities, in contrast with the findings for women.
For the 123 cases with missing cortisol measurements, neuroendocrine system values were imputed by mean substitution; complete case analyses indicated no major deviations from the estimates found in the full sample, although the coefficient for social adversity at age 21 for men did not quite reach significance.
Similar(53)
Especially for men, don't get divorced - it's terribly expensive and you might finish up with somebody you don't like any more than the first one.
Only when countries combine generous pay replacement with a use-it-or-lose-it quota for men does fathers' participation rise significantly.
A. Drinking moderate amounts of any type of alcoholic beverage — one drink a day for women, and up to two a day for men — does seem to lower the risk for heart disease and the most common type of stroke.
Washing powder for men: Do we need it?
The fact that our results are significantly more pronounced for women than for men does hence not appear to derive from differences in the latter's age.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com