Sentence examples for for mean leaf from inspiring English sources

Both direct and indirect methods are showing almost the same results for mean leaf longevity.

Previously reported maximum pollen deposition values are up to 1710 n/(cm2 day) for daily deposition rates, 7400 n/cm2 for measured cumulative deposition on slides [30] and higher than 1000 n/cm2 for mean leaf deposition (e.g. 1449 n/cm2 [22] and 3000 n/cm2 [15]).

For their proposed isolation buffer distances of 20 30 m, the EFSA Panel calculated a maximum threshold value for mean leaf pollen density of 0.28 n/cm2 at 20 m and 0.01 n/cm2 at 30 m ([14] log10 d = 2346−0.145E for distances E = 20 m and E = 30 m, where d is the leaf density in n/cm2 and E is distance in m).

The variability of mean leaf pollen density is denoted by the 95% confidence interval for the mean regression curve.

Additionally, Additional file 1: Figure S7 shows this relationship on a linear scale for daily mean leaf pollen deposition values.

Values for global mean leaf water δ18O as high as 8.7‰ have been reported [21].

In order to calculate scores for the leaves, I contact mean leaf values were calculated for each contact over each leaf.

Corresponding relation factors for maize and nettle mean leaf deposition, along with 90 and 95%% quantiles as indicators of the variation, are given in Table 2.

The D. alata genotypes were selected based on their scoring (0-6 scale) to leaf damage by [ 30] anthracnose for resistance 0-17.5 0-17.5 leaf area damage).

Sharma et al. ([2012b]) reported estimated mean leaf longevity for R. stylosa, B. gymnorhiza and K. obovata of 13.9, 17.2 and 12.1 months in the same study area using leaf mass and a leaf litterfall ratio (indirect method).

Further, subcanopy model calibration requires significant field effort and knowledge of characteristics (species composition, leaf area index & mean leaf angle for each species), and upscaling to watersheds is a significant source of uncertainty.