Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(33)
The out-of-pocket cost share of spending for LIS beneficiaries is considerably lower than that for non-LIS beneficiaries.
In collaboration with the French association for LIS (ALIS; http://alis-asso.fr/), a non-profit association created in 1997 to help LIS patients and their families, 168 patients who were members of LIS were invited (in January 2008) by letter to fill in a structured questionnaire, aided by the patient's proxy.
However, the time difference for the 24% should provide an advantage for LIS as a prognostic marker.
For LIS components and Berlin severity levels, P-values were generated using the Wilcoxon-rank sum test.
This research provides insight for LIS education, instructional design, and other disciplines that utilize distance education technologies.
Suggestions are made to improve the research methods curriculum and enhance the educational experience for LIS practitioners.
Similar(26)
Discrimination of LIS for mortality is similar to Berlin severity (P = 0.47) and SAPS II (P = 0.22) and inferior to APACHE II (P = 0.04).
The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of LIS for hospital mortality was 0.58 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.64) compared to an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.65) for the Berlin severity scores.
The predictive validity of LIS for mortality was similar to Berlin stages of severity with an area under the curve of 0.58 compared to 0.60, respectively (P-value 0.49).
Similarly, out-of-pocket expenses were higher for the non-LIS/non-GC reference group ($570) than for the non-LIS/GC group ($546, p < 0.01) and for the LIS group ($148, p < 0.01).
For the Lis' supporters, the case is not nearly so clear-cut.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com