for less expenditure

USAGE SUMMARY

"for less expenditure" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to spending less money on something. For example, "We will try to find a reliable contractor for less expenditure".

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

This suggests that the size of services, in terms of human resources, is less important to organisational quality than the range of approaches provided within each service, which in turn may translate into reduced needs for referrals and thus less expenditure.

BMC Health Services Research

The final dismantling of the remaining primary system and the BioS, both with minimized content of radionuclides might then be enabled in short time frame in an imploding way, with less expenditures for radiation protection, by taking advantage of the still intact infrastructure of the NPP, within the protective umbrella of the intact reactor containment.

Nuclear Engineering and Design

A ban requires less expenditure of government resources.

Vice

Second, similar to the reasons for less education expenditures, some large state-owned coal enterprises run their own hospitals, which reduce the governments' expenditures.

The Journal of Chinese Sociology

For total hospitalization expenditures, people with good medication adherence (MPR ≥ 80% group) had significantly less expenditures than people with poor medication adherence (MPR < 80% group).

BioMed Research International

The researchers found that for less active people, energy expenditure increased alongside increases in physical activity.

Huffington Post

He has doggedly stuck to his own budget outline, which calls for $23 billion less domestic expenditure than Congress's first plan, even as the Democrats have offered to meet him somewhere in between.

The Economist

And while both these figures may sound large, total overpayments account for less than 3% of benefit expenditure, and losses through fraud alone make up less than 1% of the benefits bill.

The Guardian - Opinion

Public health expenditure accounts for less than 1percentnt of GDP.

Globalization and Health

In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), public expenditures on RH accounted for less than 1%% of total reproductive health expenditures in 2008 and 2009 [ 47].

BMC Health Services Research

Another suggestion, eliminating congressional earmarks, accounts for less than 2percentt of federal expenditures.

Princeton University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, consider using more common synonyms like "spending" or "cost" instead of "expenditure", as it can sometimes sound overly formal.

Common error

While grammatically correct, using "for less expenditure" in informal contexts can sound unnatural. Opt for simpler alternatives like "spending less" or "at a lower cost" in everyday conversations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for less expenditure" primarily functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause by indicating the condition under which an action is performed or a state exists. It specifies the extent of financial resources utilized.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for less expenditure" is a grammatically correct but relatively uncommon way to express the concept of reducing costs or spending. Ludwig AI analysis suggests that while it's valid, simpler alternatives like "for less spending" or "at a lower cost" might be preferable in many contexts, particularly in informal communication. This phrase is most suitable in formal or business environments where precision in discussing financial resources is important. Remember to consider your audience and the tone of your writing when choosing between "for less expenditure" and its more common alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with lower spending

Replaces "expenditure" with the more common word "spending".

at a reduced cost

Changes the focus to the cost itself being lower rather than the action of expenditure.

for a smaller outlay

Substitutes "expenditure" with "outlay", implying a smaller investment.

at a more economical rate

Shifts the focus to the rate being economical, implying cost-effectiveness.

for a decreased investment

Replaces "expenditure" with "investment", suggesting a business context.

at a reduced price point

Focuses on the price being lower, suitable for commercial contexts.

with less capital deployed

Uses business terminology suggesting a reduction in invested capital.

on a shoestring budget

An idiomatic expression suggesting a very tight budget.

for minimal financial commitment

Highlights the small financial obligation involved.

at a bargain price

Implies obtaining something valuable at a low cost.

FAQs

What's a simpler way to say "for less expenditure"?

You can use alternatives like "for less spending" or "at a lower cost" depending on the context.

Is "for less expenditure" grammatically correct?

Yes, "for less expenditure" is grammatically correct, but it can sound formal. Consider your audience and the overall tone of your writing.

When is it appropriate to use "for less expenditure"?

The phrase "for less expenditure" is most appropriate in formal or business contexts where precision and a higher level of vocabulary are expected.

What's the difference between "for less expenditure" and "for less money"?

While similar, "for less expenditure" implies a careful consideration of expenses, whereas "for less money" is a more general statement about cost.