Suggestions(1)
Exact(50)
Values for leaf area are presented on the basis of half the total surface area.
The micropropagated plants showed significantly higher values for leaf area, leaf length, leaf width and leaf dry mass.
However, Ayyobi et al. (2013) reported that differences between peppermint plants treated with organic fertilizer was not significant for leaf area index and shoot dry weight.
The analysis of single leaves, as segmented after the classification process, indicated that plant architecture was satisfactorily reproduced with strong correlations obtained between measured and calculated values of leaf inclination and azimuth, while biases were observed for leaf area.
Differences between plants treated with organic fertilizers were not significant for leaf area index (Table 5) where all plants treated with organic fertilizer had higher leaf area index than plants treated with chemical fertilizer and the control.
Using this construct, we produced indirect assessments of growth rates of leaves that we call projections, which can be easily obtained in terms of allometric parameters and proxy values for leaf area, expressed as the product of leaf length and width.
Similar(10)
Especially for total leaf area and for root and petiole dry weight, but not for total above ground dry weight for which the coefficient of genetic variation was not highest in Central America.
This model takes advantage of multidimensional information available from multiple remote sensors and offers significant improvements for mapping leaf area index, particularly for forested areas where spectral indices tend to saturate.
The same is true for the basal area as a proxy for the leaf area.
The percentage phenotypic variance explained by individual, site-specific QTL varied from 7%to37%7%, with the greatest values found for the SCMR trait and lowest values for yield, leaf area index, and seed TNC.
The time required using traditional methods (flatbed scanner and ImageJ analysis) is about 5 min for capturing an image and about 3 min for analyzing leaf area (Davidson, 2011).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com