Sentence examples for for large spheres from inspiring English sources

The accuracy (SI) for small spheres decreased from 0.43 to 0.38 and for large spheres increased from 0.80 to 0.84.

For example, CT accuracy (SI) for small spheres decreased from 0.73 to 0.54, although it remained the same as the physical phantom for large spheres.

Filtering also increased accuracy (SI) for large spheres from 0.81 to 0.85 but reduced accuracy for small spheres from 0.59 to 0.49. Figure 4 CV of delineated volumes on NEMA IQ phantom data across different reconstructions and acquisitions.

For large spheres, the best scenario would be OP-OSEM with T40 which gives a mean %VE of −2.7% ± 7.8% which is translated to a volume error of −305.4 ± 762.4 ml and translates into confidence interval of 15.3%.

Overall, whether the changes are desirable is application dependent, with our data showing smaller absolute errors for smaller spheres (but not for large spheres) and reduced dependency on quantification with lesion size.

This will be more apparent for reconstructions with better RC and higher noise; although improvements in RC beyond a certain point will have minimal impact for larger spheres.

Our results also indicate that, for 68Ga-PET, a threshold of about 40% (range 37 51%) for a threshold-based VOI can be applied to receive an approximate volume for larger spheres (22 37-mm 22 37-mm), except for the highest backgroundiameterwhich correxcepts to the situation in the spleen.

This approach enables the production of a homogeneous, nondestructive and high-yield coating of the SWCNTs onto the silica surfaces, especially for larger sphere with a diameter over 1 μm.

In contrast, GradWT did not show any effect of the edge-preserving bilateral filter for larger sphere sizes (30 50 mm).

Comparison of the Weber fractions for weight and those for volume revealed that the Weber fraction for weight was significantly larger than the one for volume for the small sphere and tetrahedron and for the large sphere (p <.05, two-tailed t-test).

As can be seen in the figure, the average Weber fractions ranged from.11 for the large sphere in the surface area task to.20 for the small tetrahedron in the volume task with weight information.