Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Note: + Lower number was shown as higher satisfaction by comparison of mean values for individual question items of physical environments The principal component analysis performed to test the construct validity revealed that the scale was loaded by four components.
Similar(59)
For paired results for individual questions, refer to Table 1.
Fig. 7 Changes in the average scores for individual questions before and after the experiment.
Scores for individual questions were not normally distributed, so we compared the means of pre- and post-lab assessments using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U two-tailed test with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (Table 1).
The Michigan studies did not publish data for individual questions.
Response rates for individual questions varied.
Simple frequencies were run for individual questions.
Percent agreement between surveys for individual questions was calculated.
Response rates varied, for individual questions, from 62% to 65%.
Acceptability was evaluated through examination of completion rates for individual questions and whole sections of the questionnaire, and by analysing distributions of responses for individual questions.
Acceptability was evaluated by examining completion rates for individual questions and questionnaire sections, and by analysing distributions of responses for individual questions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com