Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

for human consumption

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for human consumption" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that a product, especially food or drink, is safe and intended for people to eat or drink. Example: "The label clearly states that this product is not for human consumption."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Preliminary cleaning is essential for human consumption.

Except they would be for human consumption.

"It's not for human consumption," she said.

News & Media

The New York Times

The cafeteria food now seems safe for human consumption.

News & Media

The New York Times

"This stuff is not meant for human consumption," she said.

Food and drink must also be fit for human consumption.

California banned horse slaughter for human consumption in 1998.

News & Media

The New York Times

They were definitely not intended for human consumption.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

This means that there is less fish for human consumption.

These exports may not even be for human consumption.

News & Media

The New York Times

The killing of dogs for human consumption repugnant.

News & Media

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When labeling food products, use "for human consumption" to clearly indicate that the product is safe and intended for people to eat, avoiding ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "for human consumption" in casual conversations; opt for simpler terms like "edible" or "safe to eat" to maintain a natural tone.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for human consumption" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun. It specifies the intended use or suitability of a product, primarily food or drink, making it safe and appropriate for people. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Wiki

7%

Academia

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for human consumption" is a common and correct prepositional phrase used to indicate that a product, typically food or drink, is safe and intended for people to eat or drink. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability across various contexts. It's frequently found in news articles, scientific publications, and formal documents related to food safety and standards. While alternatives like "edible by humans" or "safe to eat" exist, "for human consumption" is particularly useful for precise labeling and regulatory contexts. Although versatile, it should be used judiciously in informal settings to maintain a natural tone.

FAQs

What does "for human consumption" mean?

The phrase "for human consumption" means that something is safe and intended for people to eat or drink. It's commonly used on food labels and in regulatory contexts.

Which is more appropriate, "safe for humans" or "for human consumption"?

"Safe for humans" is a broader term that can apply to various products, while "for human consumption" specifically refers to food and drink that are suitable for people to eat or drink.

What can I say instead of "for human consumption"?

You can use alternatives like "edible", "safe to eat", or "fit to be eaten" depending on the context.

Is it redundant to say "safe for human consumption"?

While "for human consumption" already implies safety, using "safe for human consumption" can emphasize the safety aspect, particularly in contexts where there might be doubt or concern.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: