for having testified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for having testified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the act of giving testimony, often in a legal or formal context, indicating that someone has provided evidence or statements. Example: "She received recognition for having testified in the high-profile case, demonstrating her courage and integrity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Indeed, historians have long struggled to establish the truth in the Hiss case, which culminated in his conviction in 1950 on perjury charges for having testified that he had not given State Department documents to Chambers.

The New York Times - Tech

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Donovan's owner, a real-estate speculator, who is under federal indictment for fraud, has testified that the dog's surname was news to him.

The New Yorker

A task force member, Bridget B. Brennan, the special narcotics prosecutor for New York City, has testified before the City Council and the New York Society of Addiction Medicine that prescription drugs were being diverted to the black market.

The New York Times

Mr. Schwarz, for example, has testified that he left the station house about the time of the attack and went outside and searched the squad car for contraband Mr. Louima might have left between the seats.

The New York Times

A former bodyguard for Michael Jackson has testified that the pop star's doctor asked him to grab vials of medicine and an IV bag before an ambulance was called for the singer on the day he died.

The Guardian

"[Juffali] remains committed to maintaining his diplomatic duties and is appreciative that the office of the prime minister for St Lucia has testified first-hand that he has conducted his diplomatic duties in an exemplary manner".

The Guardian

It's often impossible to corroborate this dynamic in specific instances, but as I note in the piece, a former police official in Juárez who worked for Sinaloa has testified that Chapo instructed his subordinates to feed intelligence on their rivals to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The New York Times

Two computer specialists working for Northrop Grumman have testified before Congress and said in depositions that they were threatened with jail by White House officials if they disclosed a glitch in the system that would make it difficult, if not impossible, to retrieve any messages.

The New York Times

Allison, your B.F.F. from work, an expert witness for the plaintiff, has testified that it's a bad night for tacos, since it's raining and aren't tacos more of a summer thing anyway?

The New Yorker

Witnesses for the prosecution had testified that Mr. Williams made threatening remarks in the past.

The New York Times

Witnesses for the bank have testified that there were aspects of Ms. Cohen's revenue base that caused her accounts to be less profitable than some of her colleagues'.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for having testified" when you want to emphasize the completed action of giving testimony as the reason or basis for something.

Common error

Avoid using "for having testified" when a simpler "for testifying" would suffice. The perfect tense emphasizes the completion of the act, which might not always be necessary.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for having testified" functions as a prepositional phrase acting as an adverbial modifier. It specifies the reason or cause for an action or situation, emphasizing the completed action of giving testimony. Ludwig shows it's grammatical and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for having testified" is a grammatically correct but somewhat formal phrase used to explain the reason or cause behind an action based on someone's testimony. Ludwig AI indicates that it functions as an adverbial modifier, often appearing in news and media contexts. While correct, simpler alternatives like ""for testifying"" might be preferred in less formal situations. Remember to use it when the completed action of giving testimony needs emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

because of their testimony

This alternative emphasizes the testimony as the reason for something, altering the structure.

due to giving evidence

Replaces "testified" with "giving evidence", focusing on the act of providing proof.

as a result of testifying

Highlights the consequence of giving testimony, changing the emphasis.

on account of their deposition

Uses "deposition", a more formal term for testimony, indicating a formal setting.

because they provided testimony

Expands on the original phrase to clarify the act of providing testimony.

in light of their sworn statement

Emphasizes the formal and binding nature of the testimony.

following their courtroom statement

Specifies the context of the testimony as being in a courtroom.

after offering their account

Focuses on the personal recounting of events.

given their declaration

Uses the term "declaration", which implies a formal announcement or statement.

considering their attestation

Uses "attestation", a more formal term implying verification or confirmation.

FAQs

How can I use "for having testified" in a sentence?

You can use "for having testified" to explain the reason behind an action or consequence, such as, "She received recognition "for testifying" in the high-profile case" or "He faced backlash "for giving evidence" against his former colleagues".

Is "for having testified" formal or informal?

"For having testified" is generally considered more formal due to the use of the perfect gerund. In many cases, the simpler ""for testifying"" is acceptable and preferred.

What's the difference between "for testifying" and "for having testified"?

While both phrases are grammatically correct, ""for testifying"" is simpler and more common. "For having testified" emphasizes that the act of testifying is completed before the consequence or action being discussed.

What are some alternatives to "for having testified"?

Alternatives include "because of their testimony", "due to giving evidence", or "as a result of testifying", depending on the context.