for further reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for further reviewed" is not correct in English.
The correct form would be "for further review." You can use it when indicating that something is to be examined or assessed in more detail at a later time. Example: "The document has been submitted for further review by the committee before making a final decision."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

After the first screening based on the abstracts and titles, 801 records were excluded, and 32 full texts records remained for further reviewed.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Four [23] [25], [27] of these were not suitable for further reviewing according to our in- and exclusion criteria.

Plosone

Two reviewers independently reviewed all citations meeting criteria for further review and applied the inclusion criteria.

Critical Care

Two reviewers (AMAD and BF), working independently, identified original studies eligible for further review by screening abstracts and titles.

BMJ Open

When both reviewers marked "yes" for either screening approach, the citation was forwarded for further review.

Clinical Epidemiology

It postponed the effective date of the road-building regulation for 60 days for further review.

The New York Times

The matter is to be turned over to a study commission for further review.

The New York Times

That was the piece that was remanded to the appeals court for further review.

The New York Times

The committee overwhelmingly approved the amended budget bill, sending it to the House Appropriations Committee for further review.

The New York Times

The Faculty Senate moved to send the recommendations to various committees for further review.

The New York Times - Sports

The list was being kept open for further review until the end of this month.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct grammatical form: "for further review". This ensures clarity and professionalism in your writing. Verify your grammar before submitting documents for review.

Common error

Avoid using past participles (e.g., "reviewed") when a noun (e.g., "review") is required. In phrases like this, the noun form is necessary to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for further reviewed" attempts to function as a prepositional phrase indicating the purpose or destination of an item or action, suggesting it is intended for additional examination. However, Ludwig AI highlights that it uses an incorrect grammatical form.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for further reviewed" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies the correct form as ""for further review"", which should be used instead. This phrase indicates that something requires additional examination or assessment at a later time. While sources like The New York Times and The Guardian use similar phrases, maintaining grammatical accuracy is essential for clear and professional communication. Using the correct form ensures that your intended message is accurately conveyed across various contexts, including science, news, and formal business settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for further review

Corrects the grammatical error by using the correct noun form 'review' instead of the past participle 'reviewed'.

for additional review

Replaces 'further' with 'additional' to provide a synonymous expression of needing more review.

for subsequent review

Uses 'subsequent' to indicate that the review will happen after the current point.

for detailed review

Specifies that the review should be thorough and comprehensive.

for closer examination

Replaces 'review' with 'examination' to suggest a more meticulous inspection.

for further assessment

Substitutes 'review' with 'assessment' to broaden the scope of evaluation.

for extended evaluation

Indicates that the evaluation process will be prolonged or more in-depth.

for future consideration

Shifts the focus to considering something at a later time, rather than just reviewing.

for follow-up review

Highlights that the review is a continuation of a previous assessment.

for further scrutiny

Implies a more critical and detailed inspection.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the phrase "for further review" in a sentence?

Ensure you use the noun form "review" instead of the past participle "reviewed". For example, "The documents were submitted "for further review" by the committee" is correct.

What are some alternatives to using "for further review"?

You can use phrases like "for additional review", "for subsequent review", or "for closer examination" depending on the context.

Is it ever correct to say "for further reviewed"?

No, "for further reviewed" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is ""for further review"", using the noun form.

What is the difference between "for further review" and "under review"?

"For further review" indicates that something will be reviewed again in the future, while "under review" means something is currently being examined.