Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
This was repeated for five choices of sample sizes.
Similar(59)
Table 1 Weights for two choices for the contribution from each decomposition level (L = 4).
We presented 50 stimuli to the circuit and repeated the encoding for eight choices of σ.
It appears that test makers intuitively get the proportions right for three choices but have trouble doing so when there are more than three.
Three Pearson's correlations are 0.934, 0.947, and 0.932 for three choices of γ.
The comparison has been made by computing different quantiles for six choices of MAFs.
We then considered the scope distances of reactions from nutrient metabolites for two choices of reaction sets.
We tested the performance of both MEN and BBSR on these PKI sets with increasing error for two choices of the respective weight parameters as follows.
To determine a sensible value for p12, we compared the prior and posterior relative probabilities for H4|H3 or H4 for three choices of p12: 10−6, 10−6 and 10−5 (Fig. 3).
Taking one individual as an example, the deviation estimates for three choices of γ were 0.067, 0.062, and 0.092, with γ = 100 performing the best and γ = 200 performing the worst, presumably because the metric is sensitive to smoothness.
The man had a ready answer for one choice: The chicken goes with the claw.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com