Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for first
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for first" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to "first" as an adjective. For example, "This is my first time at this place, so I'm a bit nervous."
✓ Grammatically correct
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
Manning is 10 for 15 for 152.
News & Media
£4 for 4, sainsburys.co.uk 10.
News & Media
For sale for £2.7m.
News & Media
For 360 and PS3.
News & Media
"It counted for 3.
News & Media
For 40 whole minutes.
News & Media
All for 4 lira.
News & Media
for 6 terms.
News & Media
For 4 yrs.
News & Media
Leave for 15 minutes.
News & Media
For 15 year olds.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "for first" sparingly; ensure the context clearly indicates that something is being done as a preliminary step. Consider alternatives like "firstly" or "to begin with" for clearer communication.
Common error
Avoid using "for first" when simply indicating a primary attribute. For instance, instead of saying "Consider it for first impression", use "Consider it for a good first impression".
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for first" primarily functions as an adverbial modifier, indicating the initial purpose or reason for an action. While Ludwig's AI confirms its grammatical correctness, its uncommon usage suggests careful consideration of context.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while grammatically correct, the phrase "for first" is rarely used in contemporary English. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical validity, but the absence of examples across varied authoritative sources suggests caution in its usage. Alternatives such as "initially", "firstly", or "to begin with" offer greater clarity and are more commonly accepted in both formal and informal contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context clearly indicates the initial nature of an action or consideration to avoid misinterpretation.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
to start
A simple and direct synonym indicating the commencement of an activity.
firstly
Provides a direct synonym indicating the first item in a sequence of points.
initially
Focuses on the beginning or start, replacing "for first" with a more formal adverb.
at the beginning
Emphasizes the temporal aspect of the start, offering a more descriptive alternative.
as a first step
Focuses on the action of beginning a process or procedure.
to begin with
Suggests a starting point in a discussion or process, slightly more conversational.
primarily
Indicates the main or most important aspect initially.
in the first place
Highlights the initial reason or consideration, suitable for explanations.
in the early stages
Highlights the beginning phase of a process or project, focusing on development.
at first glance
Emphasizes an initial impression or assessment, different in meaning but related to "first".
FAQs
How can I use "for first" in a sentence?
While grammatically sound, "for first" is not a commonly used phrase. It is best used when emphasizing that something is being considered or done as an initial step. For instance, "We're testing this software for first impressions."
What are some alternatives to saying "for first"?
You can use alternatives like "initially", "firstly", or "to begin with" depending on the context.
Is "for first" grammatically correct?
Yes, "for first" is grammatically correct, but it is not a very common or idiomatic phrase. Consider using more common alternatives for better clarity.
When should I avoid using "for first"?
Avoid using "for first" when you intend to simply describe something as being 'first' in a series. Instead, use "first" as an adjective directly. For example, use "for a first attempt" instead of "for first attempt".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested