'for exhaustiveness' is a perfectly valid phrase in written English.
You can use it when you are trying to emphasize how complete or thorough something is. For example: "This project demanded a great deal of research, and I worked diligently on it for exhaustiveness."
Unlike the Web, however, the almanac aims for exhaustiveness within clearly defined limits.
At any rate, that remains the model for exhaustiveness of a kind.
It appears to aim for exhaustiveness, when it would benefit from creating patterns that evoke an idea.
Without any claim for exhaustiveness, let us cite several difficulties which augment this complexity.
Misses of two and three mismatches in 36 nt reads by GSNAP were cases where the number of mismatches exceeded the guarantee condition of ⌊ L/14⌋−1 for exhaustiveness, essentially because mismatches were spaced evenly enough to prevent a consecutive stretch of 14 nt to match between the read and genome.
This source of data, although available at the time of study, was not assessed for the exhaustiveness of its integration into the Registry information system and therefore has not been included in the analysis.
In a review in The Guardian, the author Paul Theroux, himself a beekeeper, called the book a masterwork "for its enormous scope and exhaustiveness, for being an up-to-date treasure house of apiaristic facts".
A statistic could be chosen that describes the support level for each discrete level of exhaustiveness and subjected to hierarchical significance tests.
All the technical steps are crucial for quality and exhaustiveness of the results obtained by such approach.
On the other hand, Chen [39] proved that for (n=1) Bergman exhaustiveness does imply Bergman completeness.
Since humans are able to make sound relevance judgments and reduce instantiation uncertainty of knowledge most of the times, the following questions arise: What is their strategy for increasing the exhaustiveness of their knowledge base while managing its exponential complexity?
