Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
During pretest and post-test, medical charts (random subsets of 10 patients a week) were reviewed for errors of omission, defined as deviations from our care protocols.
On the K-CPT, 19% of children scored markedly atypical for errors of omission, 17% for errors of commission, and 6% for hit reaction time; taken together, 8% of children scored ≥ 70% on the standardized ADHD Confidence Index scale.
Similar(58)
Broadly speaking, engineering approaches very often account for error of omission forgetting the errors of commission (EOC), and, on top of that, they do not make any macro distinction between pre- and post-initiating human failures.
Regret for errors of commission vs. omission may differ and should be considered by vaccine policymakers.
Further exploration of how regret for errors of commission and omission may influence parental preferences in vaccination programs is needed, particularly as new vaccines are recommended for use.
Also after adjusting for the number of errors of omission and commission, none of the BFR exposure indicators was significantly related with the mean reaction time in the Continuous Performance test.
Given the frequency and impact of errors of omission, preventive measures for this type of error should be investigated in further studies.
Associations, albeit modest, were strongest for CPT errors of omission and reaction time variability, indicators of inattention, and WISC-III Processing Speed, also related to attentional skills.
The specialist nurse reports, in particular, were important to help identify decisions made and actions taken, and hence provided an evidential basis for identifying errors of omission or commission.
Even when data was collected on standard forms and sent to sponsors (either commercial sponsors or the NIH or VA for multicenter trials), errors of omission and commission still occurred.
We determined continuous T-scores (standardized to a nonclinical population) for errors of commission, errors of omission, and hit reaction time (Conners and Staff 2001).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com