for equal

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for equal" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to express a concept related to equality or fairness, but it needs additional context or words to convey a complete thought. Example: "We strive for equal opportunities for all employees."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Are they paid equally for equal work?

Forbes

And as for equal pay?

The Guardian

How's that for equal time?

The New York Times - Arts

The campaign for equal pay?

The New Yorker

Equal pay for equal work".

Independent

Arguments for Equal Opportunity.

Stanford University

Not for equal opps reasons.

The Guardian

It's time for equal pay for equal work.

The Washington Post

Equal Pay for Equal Work.

The New York Times

Planning Action for Equal Opportunity.

Cornell University

I'm all for equal prize money.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "for equal", always complete it with a noun or noun phrase to clarify the intended meaning. For example, use "for equal opportunities", "for equal pay", or "for equal rights".

Common error

Avoid using "for equal" without a clarifying noun or noun phrase. This can lead to ambiguity and misinterpretation. Ensure the context clearly indicates what you are advocating or striving for.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for equal" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, typically requiring a noun or noun phrase to complete its meaning and express a goal or purpose. As Ludwig AI points out, without additional context, it is grammatically incomplete.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Academia

28%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "for equal" is frequently used across various sources, Ludwig AI suggests it's grammatically incomplete without a clarifying noun. Its primary function is to express a desire or effort toward achieving equality, with the specific meaning determined by the noun it modifies. The phrase appears most commonly in news and academic contexts and carries a neutral tone. When using "for equal", ensure you complete the phrase to avoid ambiguity and clearly convey your intended meaning. Alternatives like "towards equality" or "aiming for equity" can provide greater grammatical clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

towards equality

Focuses on the direction or movement toward achieving equality, rather than a state of being equal.

aiming for equity

Emphasizes the goal of achieving equity, which considers fairness and justice beyond just sameness.

in pursuit of fairness

Highlights the active process of seeking fair outcomes and treatment.

striving for impartiality

Focuses on the effort to be unbiased and neutral in judgment or action.

promoting balanced opportunities

Emphasizes the creation and support of equal opportunities for all.

working towards just outcomes

Highlights the effort to achieve fair and equitable results.

advocating for equitable solutions

Focuses on promoting solutions that address disparities and ensure fairness.

dedicated to leveling the playing field

Emphasizes the commitment to creating a fair and equal environment.

fighting for parity

Highlights the struggle to achieve a state of equality, especially in terms of status or pay.

committed to equal rights

Emphasizes dedication to ensuring everyone has the same fundamental rights and protections.

FAQs

How can I use "for equal" correctly in a sentence?

The phrase "for equal" needs to be completed with a noun to make sense. For example, use "for equal rights", "for equal pay", or "for equal opportunities". Without it, the phrase is incomplete and unclear.

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "for equal"?

Consider using phrases like "towards equality", "aiming for equity", or "in pursuit of fairness" depending on the context.

Is it ever correct to use "for equal" on its own?

While frequently found in various sources, Ludwig AI indicates that "for equal" is grammatically incomplete and requires a noun or noun phrase to provide a clear meaning. Using it alone can lead to confusion.

How does the meaning of "for equal" change with different nouns?

The meaning of "for equal" depends entirely on the noun that follows it. "For equal pay" refers to the concept of equal compensation for equal work, while "for equal rights" refers to the broader fight for equal treatment under the law.