Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
In a second level random effects group analysis, individual regionally specific effects of conditions for each subject were compared using a within-subject ANOVA (2×2 design with the factors regulation condition (regulation, no regulation) and valence (negative, neutral) with non-sphericity correction resulting in a t-statistic for every voxel.
Similar(59)
The two groups of subjects were compared using t test for all the visual stimulation pattern.
Analyses were performed with Epi Info™ 2002 Results from patients with SLE and control subjects were compared using the χ2 test for statistical significance.
Case and control subjects were compared using the contingency |2 test for independence or Fisher's exact test depending on the numbers.
Groups of subjects were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for quantitative variables, and χ tests or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables.
Baseline characteristics between case patients and matched control subjects were compared using McNemar's χ test for categorical variables and a paired t test for continuous variables.
Differences in baseline characteristics between case patients and control subjects were compared using the paired t-test for continuous variables and the χ-test for categorical variables.
Demographic variables between patients with schizophrenia and control subjects were compared using two sample Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.
The mean measurements for each subject were compared between the early and late groups using Welch Two Sample t tests (Table 1) with no difference seen.
Subjects' characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact or Chi-squared tests for categorical variables or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, where appropriate.
The baseline characteristics between study subjects with different outcomes were compared using a chi-square test for categorical variables and t test for continuous variables.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com