Sentence examples for for each subgroup were compared using from inspiring English sources

Changes in proliferative indices and receptor expression levels between core biopsy specimens and operative specimen for each subgroup were compared using paired sample t-tests.

The differences between radiological and pathological paired measurements for the various subgroups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test.

After measuring the frequencies for presentation of the data, differences between the three respondent subgroups were compared using a chi-square analysis.

Subgroups were compared using unpaired t test for continuous variables and Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

The responses in the PICUs and in these subgroups were compared using the Chi-square statistic, with p < 0.05 accepted as significant after Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.

The length variables (BCB, APDLC and APDMC) in the various subgroups were compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Frequencies of p16 mutations in different subgroups were compared using Fischer's exact test.

The neuropsychological scores of the two subgroups were compared using ANCOVA as described above.

Patient subgroups were compared using Fisher's exact test.

Subgroups were compared using the log-rank test.

Subgroups were compared using nonparametric tests (Mann–Whitney U-test).