Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
One point is scored for each positive answer; the highest possible score is 40 points [22].
Subindexes for material, social and health deprivation were calculated adding one point for each positive answer.
For all dichotomous items one point was allocated for each positive answer, except from the one item on suicidal thoughts that by itself scored 10 points.
One point was given for each positive answer about practicing interventions with demonstrated efficacy, i.e. nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, counselling, group therapy, and smoking cessation specialist.
Similar(56)
Each positive answer is assigned a score of 1.
One point was allocated for each positive ("yes") answer resulting in a score from zero to six [0 (no knowledge) to 6 (high knowledge)].
Now each authority Abelard cites seems to speak clearly and unambiguously either for a positive answer to a given question or for a negative one.
A sufficient condition is given for a positive answer to the above question.
We give sufficient conditions for a positive answer to this question in a typical case of heterosis (when mixed genotypes are better than the pure ones, implying stable coexistence of all allele types).
In this paper we will show that there is a rich source of material on the roughness of the boundaries permitted for a positive answer of the question which has not yet been exploited, and indeed hardly touched.
For a positive answer to this question might seem to threaten these two principles, or at least to show that they need radical revision if they are to be defensible.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com