Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for each next
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for each next" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a sequence or iteration, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "For each next step in the process, ensure that you follow the guidelines carefully."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
For each next level of tile pyramid, the point space is expanded by doubling of size in both directions (x) and (y).
"Every interview stage involved so much research and mental preparation, exhaustion afterwards, waiting, waiting and more waiting, plus … psyching yourself up for each next stage," Martins said of the three-month process.
News & Media
Second, for each next sequence oligonucleotides were only designed for regions that were not probed by previously designed oligonucleotides.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Lump maintains a queue for each next-hop address, where it stores the packets.
To further clarify joint expectations, the project team placed the expected "wins" for each company next to each objective.
News & Media
For each, their next contract will make them richer than they ever dared dream of as immigrants into foreign lands.
News & Media
The results of the follow-up surveys will be displayed in the DISC risk profile for each unit, next to the base-line scores.
Science
Next, say one Hail Mary for each of the next three beads, taking each bead in your fingers as you begin each prayer in succession.
Wiki
They demanded $1 million $$ today), divided equally over the next three years, or $167,000 $$ today) each for the next three seasons.
Wiki
So we'll award five points for the worst referee abusers (West Brom, 11 yellows for dissent), four each for the next worst (Chelsea, Watford, 10), and three each for the next (Aston Villa, Leicester City, Tottenham, eight).
News & Media
Qualified candidates for county executive or council would receive $7 for each dollar of a qualified contribution up to $25, $5 for each dollar received for the next $50 and $1 for each dollar received for the next $75.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When indicating sequential steps or items, prefer using "for each subsequent" or "for each following" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.
Common error
The combination of "each" and "next" can create awkward phrasing. Replace it with clearer alternatives like "subsequent" or "following" to enhance readability.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for each next" attempts to function as a determiner phrase specifying individual items in a sequence. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it's not grammatically correct, leading to ambiguity.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "for each next" is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Ludwig AI confirms its non-standard usage, and while it appears in a few sources, it is not recommended for formal or professional writing. Prefer using alternatives like "for each subsequent" or "for each following" for better clarity and grammatical correctness. Its infrequency and awkwardness make it an undesirable choice in most contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
for each subsequent
Replaces "next" with "subsequent" to indicate the following item in a sequence.
for each following
Uses "following" instead of "next" to describe the items that come after.
for every next
Employs "every" instead of "each" to broaden the scope slightly while retaining the original meaning.
in each next
Uses "in" before "each" adding focus
for all next
Employing "all" in place of "each" emphasizes the collective nature of the subsequent steps
for each additional
Replaces "next" with "additional" to highlight that something extra is being considered in each step.
for each further
Using "further" instead of "next" to indicate progression in a series.
for each successive
Substitutes "next" with "successive" to denote a continuous sequence.
for each future
Replacing "next" with "future" to refer to actions expected to happen
for each upcoming
Replacing "next" with "upcoming" to mean something impending
FAQs
What's a better way to say "for each next"?
Consider using alternatives like "for each subsequent", "for each following", or "for every next" depending on the context.
Is "for each next" grammatically correct?
No, the phrase "for each next" is not grammatically correct. It's better to use phrases like "for each subsequent" or "for each following".
How can I use "for each subsequent" in a sentence?
You can use phrases like "for each subsequent" in sentences such as, "For each subsequent step, ensure you have the necessary tools."
What is the difference between "for each next" and "for each subsequent"?
While both attempt to convey a sense of sequence, "for each next" is grammatically awkward. "For each subsequent" is a more standard and clear way to express the same idea.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested