Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The costs for this system would be 6.42 million $ for each km.
The mean of three independent measurements and the standard deviation of these is plotted for each KM.
This between-method difference tended to increase by 198 (95 % CI: 147, 249) counts · min−1 for each km · h−1 increase in speed.
Using homestead as our unit of analysis, we found that the incidence of dispensary attendance declined with distance from the dispensary (on average −0.040 (95%CI 0.036 0.044) and −0.041 (95%CI 0.037 0.046) episodes per child year for each km for malaria smear positive and negative attendees, respectively).
Similar(56)
A simple but useful fact (see e.g. [12, 13]) is that for each KM-fuzzy quasi-metric ( M, ∗ ) on a set X and each x, y ∈ X, the function M ( x, y, _ ) is nondecreasing.
The species richness for each 2 km × 2 km cell ranges between one and 107 with an average of 40.7 species (standard deviation = 18.52).
We generated a prediction map from each of these submodels and calculated both the mean prediction and 95% confidence interval around the prediction for each 5 km × 5 km pixel for each species.
Finally, we used a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) with spatial smoothing and a random intercept for each 1 km × 1 km grid cell to impute data for grid cells/days for which AOD measurements were not available (stage 3).
Fig. 2 Results of the inversion (CG6) for the 3-D shear wave velocity structure in the lowermost 400 km of the mantle beneath the Northern Pacific and Alaska for each 50 km depth slice.
We then averaged the probability across all 100 1-km squares in a given 10-km square to obtain the average probability of main sett presence (per 1-km square) for each 10-km square in Britain, after White et al. [ 12].
We also calculated the attack rate in a reference ring of 5-10 km around each potential source farm and used this to compute relative risks (RR) for each 1 km concentric ring.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com