Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
It is presumed that there is a threshold index for each household, t i * such that if t i * > t i th household is observed as a participant in fodder production and if t i * < t i, then the household is a non-participant.
Similar(59)
First, we selected the real income of households at time 0 that had (hat{f}_{0}) near the value estimated for each household at time t (that is (hat{f}_{t})).
In fact, we selected two incomes at time 0 for each household at time t (those with income that were immediately higher and lower in terms of (hat{f})).
Means are simple arithmetic averages of five expenditures per household Fig. 2 Equivalized carbon footprint (CF) (t-CO2eq/y) for each household income quintile in 2005.
Triangles denote the carbon footprint per unit expenditure (t-CO2eq/M-JPY) for each household income quintile (corresponding to the right vertical axis) Fig. 3 Equivalized material footprint (MF) for neodymium (t/y) for each household income quintile in 2005.
For just £340 per household every year, the benefits in return add up to £3,000 for each household annually.
Battle: Mailbox According to the United States Postal Service, American households receive 100.5 billion pieces of junk mail, or 868 pieces for each household, each year.
Triangles denote the material footprint per unit expenditure (t/M-JPY) for each household income quintile (corresponding to the right vertical axis) Fig. 5 Equivalized material footprint (MF) for platinum (t/y) for each household income quintiles in 2005.
Triangles denote the material footprint per unit expenditure (t/M-JPY) for each household income quintile (corresponding to the right vertical axis) Fig. 4 Equivalized material footprint (MF) for cobalt (t/y) for each household income quintile in 2005.
Triangles denote the material footprint per unit expenditure (t/M-JPY) for each household income quintile (corresponding to the right vertical axis).
Contact matrices for each household.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com