Group differences in hemispheric performance were explored using planned contrasts between visual fields for each group separately.
Group differences for target visual field performance were explored using planned contrasts between the visual field accuracy data for each group separately.
Given the heterogeneity of the groups, we obtain the parameters for each group separately.
A statistical analysis of data was performed for each group separately.
We therefore report precision results for each group separately in the following section.
Firstly, we tested for configural invariance (the free model, unconstrained) running the CFA model for each group separately.
For other subsectors, however, LR test has been applied for determining the appropriate function for each group separately.
The means and standard deviations were computed for each group separately and the mean and first standard deviation intervals are presented in Fig. 2.
Comparisons of the 20 30-min 20 30-minth NRS scores to the bandline NRS score were done for each group separately using the paired t-test.
To investigate the source of the significant interaction effect for the HIT-6, we conducted all pairwise comparisons for all time points for each group separately (see Table 5 and Fig. 3).
Adrenaline and sTest data were analysed using non-parametric Friedman tests for each group separately; adrenaline differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests between TETRA and the other two subgroups (with intact sympathetic function) combined.
