Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
The result of the scanning and fitting operation are two dimensional distribution images, one for each fitted elemental line.
For each fitted model, we evaluate the log-likelihood of each sequence.
Five geological considerations are then discussed for the two volcanic fields that then form the underlying assumptions and related uncertainties for each fitted boundary.
For each fitted model, ROC curves and other performance statistics were computed in order to assess the predictive performance of each fingerprint.
Using h as a minimal step size for each fitted segment, the program can dynamically interpolate the data and increase the number of points only where the creep compliance changes faster.
For each fitted model (three models and ( {hat{CC}}_{mathrm{VERT}} ) or ( {hat{CC}}_{mathrm{HEMI}} )), we used 20-fold cross-validation and calculated the root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) and RMSPE as a percent of the mean (RMSPE%), defined as: mathrm{RMSPE} = sqrt{{displaystyle sum_{i=1}^n}frac{{left {y}_{iv} - {hat{y}}_{iv}right)}^2}{n}} (4).
Similar(44)
Average SNR is reported for each fit.
The MAPE for each fit is also given.
For each fit the resulting χ2 is monitored in order to verify the reliability of the results.
Based on the least squares regression coefficient of determination, R2, for each fit, a logarithmic correlation proved a better fit for five of the seven experimental data sets.
It yields three physically meaningful parameters for each fit, including a protein diffusivity in the cytoplasm that varies little within experimental treatments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com