Exact(24)
Figure 4 presents the median values and 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles for each point estimate based on the 1,000 simulations for each estimation method, using a sample size of 1,500 for each simulation.
We evaluate the MLE and GVL for each estimation.
A ± 10% limit of agreement for each estimation method was arbitrarily considered acceptable.
Note that z does not have to be recalculated for each estimation.
For each estimation phase, PLS software sensors are designed, and their performance is evaluated against plant data.
This information is used here to maximize the probability of correct choice within available options for each estimation step.
Similar(36)
First, separate tests were conducted for values obtained from each estimation method.
Figure 10 shows the histogram and the line of the estimated probability density function by each estimation method for each rectangular region.
To examine whether the two energy measures, bomb calorimetry and calculation methods, estimated different energy contents, separate meta-analyses were prepared for each energy estimation method and compared.
Figure 3 show the overall accuracy data for each weight estimation system (PW10 data).
N = 100 random sampling points were taken for each turbidity estimation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com