Exact(1)
We believe this equation could be useful for comparing study groups, in terms of average peak aerobic capacity without the need for CPET, where the 6 MWT is used to monitor the natural history of a disease or determine the efficacy of various forms of treatment.
Similar(59)
In addition, if epidemiological studies are to use the continuous metabolic syndrome score, a standardized method of calculating the score may prove beneficial for comparing studies.
For PCB levels, a study by Hagmar proposed a relative body burden (RBB) measure for comparing studies with different analytic methods, different congeners measured, different biological matrices, and with and without adjustment for lipid composition (Hagmar 2003).
Although we assume that the meta-analysis is statistically accurate, the biological basis for comparing studies with this degree of heterogeneity in the definition of exposure is more problematic, and this should be taken into account when interpreting the results.
The minimum level of statistical significance for comparing the study groups was set at p<0.05.
Such variation calls for caution when comparing studies using different methods.
Accurate incidence measures using denominator data adjusted for the at-risk population are warranted for comparing MRSA studies.
The available data demonstrates that the available sediment sources for the compared studied sites are similar.
For dichotomous data, we compared study groups using risk ratios (RRs).
Second, we compared study variables for early and late respondents.
The use of standardized methods in driver distraction research is essential for comparing results across studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com