Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The simulated size selection was found to agree well with previously published results for codend size selection of red mullet obtained from sea trials.
These basic results from field measurements could help with understanding the flow inside the codend and could be useful for codend design and further selectivity control.
Similar(58)
Increase in mesh size was found to increase L50 for all three species for both codend types.
In addition, the obtained size selectivity for the codends made of Dyneema netting were compared to results obtained for T90 codends made of standard 5 mm single twine PE netting, and to previous results for other PE codends used in the same fishery.
For the T90 codend, the selection parameters (L50 and SR) were 43.4 and 6.7 cm for cod, and 24.7 and 2.1 cm for plaice.
L50 was significantly increased and SR significantly reduced for a window codend with the same window mesh size (WMS) as that of a standard codend.
Furthermore, reducing the number of meshes in the codend circumference for the Dyneema codends significantly increased the size selection of cod but did not affect the size selection of plaice and flounder.
The selection parameters for the most effective modified Bacoma codend were 41.1 and 8.3 cm for cod and 25.2 and 3.9 cm for plaice.
Partitioning of data by vessel revealed that such shortfalls in retained catch were evident for only some vessels, while the square-mesh codend performed as intended for the others.
By using knowledge of fish morphology and the computer-based simulation method FISHSELECT, we investigated the potential for size selection of cod in square mesh codends for demersal seining.
Several experimental studies have been carried out to assess the codend size selectivity for red mullet in the last two decades.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com