For clearer comparison, the normalized dead cell ratio is quantitatively provided in Fig. 6b.
For clearer comparison, the labeled parts of Figure 10i-p are extracted and shown in Figure 10q-x.
Again, for clearer comparison, the difference images between the fused images, which are fused results using Methods 1-7 and our proposed method, and the source images which are shown in Figure 5d are given in Figure 9i-p.
Our materials are ideal for clear comparisons with simulations because they have a much stronger ionomer scattering peak than randomly spaced analogs, and because of their highly ordered morphology.
The intentional exclusion of co-morbidities helped to avoid confounding factors and allowed for clear comparisons that were necessary to meet the defined objectives of the study.
The part surrounded by the rectangle in a is enlarged in Fig. 14 for clear comparison.
Figure 14 shows close-ups of the same part of the image obtained using each method for clear comparison.
Note that the reconstructed image may be flipped for the global phase factor in its Fourier transform; the translation has been removed for clear comparison.
For clear comparison a summarized number of complex additions and multiplications for each of our used test scenarios and use-cases is shown.
