for both sides

USAGE SUMMARY

"for both sides" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation or agreement that is balanced and beneficial to multiple parties. For example: "We were able to reach a mutually beneficial agreement that was fair for both sides."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Perhaps even for both sides".

The New York Times - Arts

For both sides, that meant major movement.

The New York Times

(Chalk one up for both sides).

The New Yorker

It is hard work for both sides.

The Economist

You could make arguments for both sides.

The New York Times

"He was peacemaker for both sides.

The New York Times - Magazine

The stakes are high for both sides.

The New York Times

The relationship has worked for both sides.

The New York Times - Sports

It was a compromise for both sides.

The New York Times

For both sides, the stakes are high.

The New York Times

"I see risks here for both sides".

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for both sides" to indicate impartiality and balance. It demonstrates a fair consideration of all perspectives involved.

Common error

Avoid using "for both sides" when the situation disproportionately affects one party more than the other. It can minimize genuine inequalities.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both sides" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase. It typically modifies a verb or noun, indicating that an action, agreement, or situation applies equally or reciprocally to two distinct parties. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for both sides" is a versatile prepositional phrase commonly used to express fairness, balance, and reciprocity. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English. As evidenced by numerous examples, primarily from news and media sources, it describes situations where two distinct parties are equally affected or considered. While alternatives such as "mutually beneficial" and "equally advantageous" exist, "for both sides" provides a straightforward and widely understood way to convey impartiality. When using this phrase, clarity in defining the "sides" and awareness of potential power imbalances are crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mutually beneficial

Emphasizes the benefit received by each party.

equally advantageous

Underscores that the advantage is balanced between the parties.

to each party's advantage

Highlights the advantageous nature of a situation for everyone involved.

fair to all parties

Focuses on the fairness and impartiality of the situation.

reciprocal arrangement

Stresses the mutual or give-and-take aspect of the agreement.

of mutual interest

Indicates that something is beneficial or important for everyone involved.

a two-way street

An idiom that represents reciprocity and mutual exchange.

for each stakeholder

Highlights that different stakeholders have different interests.

for either party

This means something is valid or possible regardless of who's concerned.

affecting all participants

Emphasizes the broad impact of a situation on everyone involved.

FAQs

How can I use "for both sides" in a sentence?

You can use "for both sides" to indicate that a situation, agreement, or argument is applicable or beneficial to two distinct parties. For example, "The compromise was a win "win-win" for both sides".

What does "for both sides" imply?

The phrase "for both sides" implies neutrality, fairness, and a balanced approach, suggesting that whatever is being discussed affects or benefits each party involved equally or in a way that addresses their respective needs or concerns.

What are some alternatives to saying "for both sides"?

Alternatives include "mutually beneficial", "equally advantageous", "fair to all parties", or "reciprocal arrangement", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it inappropriate to use "for both sides"?

It may be inappropriate when there is a clear imbalance of power or impact, such as when one side is significantly more affected than the other. In such cases, using "for both sides" could downplay real disparities or injustices.