Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(48)
For both questionnaires, all items had correlations >0.40 with their own scales (0.58 0.91), supporting item-convergent validity.
The analysis showed sufficient internal consistency for both questionnaires (Cronbach alphas 0.7617 for asthma and 0.8317 for COPD).
This was observed for both questionnaires.
Proxy versions are available for both questionnaires.
The occurrence of missing answers was low for both questionnaires.
The reliability standard for both questionnaires was satisfactory.
Similar(12)
Note, for both questionnaire-based and logs-based cyber/physical behaviors, we do not know the Web content accessed, only the coarse category of the content.
For each EP map, separate correlation analyses were performed (for duration and GFP) for both questionnaire scores.
Completion rates and missing data were similar for both questionnaire versions.
Completion and missing-data rates were similar for both questionnaire versions.
Data on age, gender and cancer diagnosis were obtained for both questionnaire responders and non-responders.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com