for both persons

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both persons" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to two people or parties who are involved in a situation. For example: "This contract outlines the terms of the agreement for both persons".

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

If the world is deterministic, then there are such rules for both persons and machines (though perhaps it is not possible to write down the rules).

SEP

The claim is that the broadly conventionalist ways which are used to deal with problem cases through time for both persons and material objects, and which can also be employed in cases of counterfactuals concerning origin for bodies, cannot be used for similar counterfactuals concerning persons or minds.

SEP

The convex point at the vertex of the possible set of solutions corresponds to the optimal utility gain for both persons.

Plosone

In most applications of IRT, reliability is estimated for both persons and for items.

BMC Geriatrics

At the summary level the overall mean residual values for both persons and items can be calculated.

Brain

The passive positioning alarm was perceived as providing valuable support for both persons with dementia and their spouses.

BMC Geriatrics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Responses to this challenge included research designs that improved reliability and accounted for both person and situation in an interactionist model.

Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Secondly, there was activation in the posterior part of the left middle frontal gyrus for both Person Mismatches and Unagreement, reflecting the evaluation of the morpho-syntactic match between agreeing constituents.

NeuroImage

The four methods compared are logistic regression accounting neither person nor item clustering effect, hierarchical logistic regression accounting for person clustering effect, the testlet model accounting for the item clustering effect, and the multilevel testlet model accounting for both person and item clustering effects.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

Here, the Rasch measurement model is employed to investigate the scale's functioning and fit for both person and item diagnostics of 120 IFSPs that were previously analyzed with a classical test theory approach.

Studies in Educational Evaluation

In an interview, Mixpanel CEO Suhail Doshi explained that he thinks there's opportunity for both person-specific and general user data to work together to inform product development and direction.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for both persons" when referring to the impact or implications affecting two specific individuals, especially in formal or legal contexts. Ensure clarity by defining who these "persons" are early in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "persons" in casual writing; it often sounds overly formal or stilted. Opt for the more common and natural "people" instead, unless the formal context warrants the specific term.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both persons" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase. According to Ludwig, it indicates that an action, condition, or attribute applies equally to two individuals. It often introduces a clause specifying the scope or beneficiaries of a particular situation or agreement.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for both persons" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that something applies equally to two individuals, as affirmed by Ludwig. While accurate, this expression is more formal and less common than "for both people". It's most frequently found in scientific and news contexts, suggesting a formal register. When writing, consider your audience and the level of formality required; in many cases, "for both people" may be a more natural choice. To avoid sounding overly formal, save "for both persons" for legal or official documents where precision is paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for both people

Uses the more common term "people" instead of "persons".

for both individuals

Replaces "persons" with "individuals", emphasizing each one's distinct identity.

for the two persons

Specifies that there are exactly two people being referred to.

for each of the two persons

Adds emphasis on individuality of each person.

applicable to both persons

Highlights that something applies or is relevant to each person.

concerning both persons

Indicates that the matter relates to or affects both people.

in regard to both persons

Similar to 'concerning', but adds a layer of formality.

for both parties involved

Emphasizes the involvement or stake each person has in a situation.

with respect to both persons

Formal way to indicate that something relates to both people being discussed.

regarding both persons

Another way of saying 'concerning' or 'about'.

FAQs

When is it appropriate to use "for both persons"?

Use "for both persons" in formal or legal contexts where precision is important. In less formal situations, consider using "for both people".

Is there a difference between using "persons" and "people"?

While both refer to more than one individual, "persons" is generally more formal and is often used in legal or official documents. "People" is more common in everyday language.

Can I use "for both individuals" instead of "for both persons"?

Yes, "for both individuals" is a suitable alternative that maintains a formal tone while sounding slightly less stiff than "for both persons".

What are some contexts where "for both persons" is commonly used?

"For both persons" is often found in legal documents, scientific research papers, and formal reports where clarity and precision are essential.