Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
We assume equal power allocation for both CUEs and D2D users.
Furthermore, we provide analytical insights on the behavior of these metrics for both CUEs and D2D users.
Then, we proceed to derive the coverage probability for both CUEs and D2D users which are needed to compute these metrics.
Results show effects for both cues, thereby confirming our hypothesis that users' expectations towards their audience may be based on an overload heuristic.
Although this scheme avoids the interference between CUEs and DUEs by using the fractional frequency reuse (FFR) concept, it does not guarantee minimum performance requirements for both CUEs and DUEs.
Furthermore, if we keep increasing λ d, even though the rate per link decreases for both CUEs and D2D users, there is a local minima after which the aggregate D2D rate over all D2D users becomes higher and the ASR increases again.
Similar(48)
The results demonstrate that anterior cingulate, and parahippocampus activates higher for both cue-induced gaming urge and smoking craving among the comorbid group in comparison to the control group.
For both cue types, valid temporal predictions speeded reaction times when compared to neutral conditions.
As in the two-hemifields configuration, the validity effect is found for both cue instruction conditions (no validity×cue interaction, F 1,7) = 0.002, p = 0.96).
For both cue-induced and cognitive craving, significant interaction effects were found for DRD2 Taq1A with parental smoke exposure (Table 4).
For both cue-induced and cognitive craving, significant interaction effects were found for DRD2 Taq1A with parental smoke exposure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com