Similar(60)
For any sequence, and.
for any sequence in.
and for any sequence holds.
For any sequence in with, we have,.
for any sequences such that as and.
For any sequence with as, let.
For any sequence, we define (2.11).
For any sequence with, we have (3.5).
For any sequence of mappings, it holds that (2.12).
Then, for any sequence with, we have (4.27).
Thus, for any sequence satisfying with, we have.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com