for all individuals

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for all individuals" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to express inclusivity or universality regarding people. Example: "The policy is designed to promote equal opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their background."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Demonstrate respect for all individuals.

Cornell University

Lead exposure is a risk for all individuals.

The New York Times

However, even these drugs do not provide effective treatment outcomes for all individuals.

Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Exercise is necessary for overall health and well-being for all individuals.

Disability and Health Journal

Like the fairness paradigm, it promotes equal opportunity for all individuals.

Harvard Business Review

This rule applies for all individuals, regardless of their method of accounting.

Cornell University

ED: At one level, happiness is the same in all cultures and for all individuals.

University of California, Berkeley

Providing quality health care for all individuals and families is both ethical and cost effective.

Stanford University

The government must guarantee counsel for all individuals, documented or undocumented, who cannot afford a private attorney.

The New Yorker

Our profession is to facilitate the best care possible for all individuals.

The New York Times

(A) Plots of position ratio profiles for all individuals.

EPJ Data Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for all individuals" when you want to emphasize the inclusion of every single person, regardless of any specific characteristics or circumstances. It's often used in formal or legal contexts to ensure there are no exclusions.

Common error

While "for all individuals" is grammatically correct, consider whether a simpler phrase like "for everyone" or "for all people" would be more appropriate in less formal contexts. Overusing formal language can make your writing sound stilted or unnatural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for all individuals" functions as a prepositional phrase that introduces a scope or beneficiary of an action, policy, or condition. Ludwig AI examples show it commonly specifies who is included or affected. The AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

Academia

24%

News & Media

18%

Less common in

Formal & Business

13%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for all individuals" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to emphasize inclusivity and universality. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for formal contexts where precision is important. While commonly found in scientific, academic, and news-related content, consider using simpler alternatives like "for everyone" in less formal settings. Remember to avoid overuse to maintain a natural writing style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for every person

Replaces "individuals" with the more common term "person", simplifying the phrase.

for each person

Emphasizes individual consideration rather than a collective group.

for everyone

A more concise and informal substitute for "for all individuals".

for all people

Replaces "individuals" with "people", making the phrase more accessible and less formal.

without exception

Shifts the focus to the absence of exclusions, rather than the inclusion of everyone.

universally

Emphasizes the broad applicability of something.

across the board

Indicates that something applies to all members of a group or situation without exception.

for one and all

A more emphatic and somewhat old-fashioned way to say "for everyone".

to each and every person

Highlights the individual aspect of the recipients, providing an emphatic tone.

without regard to person

Highlights impartiality and lack of bias.

FAQs

What is the difference between "for all individuals" and "for everyone"?

"For all individuals" is more formal and emphasizes each person distinctly, while "for everyone" is a more casual, collective term. The best choice depends on the context and desired tone.

When is it best to use "for all individuals" over other similar phrases?

Use "for all individuals" in situations that require precision and formality, such as legal documents or policy statements, where you want to explicitly include each person without exception.

Are there contexts where "for all individuals" might be inappropriate?

In very informal or casual settings, "for all individuals" might sound overly formal. In such cases, alternatives like "for everyone" or "for all people" might be more suitable.

Can I replace "for all individuals" with "for any individual"?

No, the meanings are different. "For all individuals" means for every person, whereas "for any individual" means for at least one person or any single person.